Last week QR Codes were CMLE’s featured Recommended Ed. Tech Tool & App. This week we interviewed Debbie Disher, Media Specialist at Holdingford Area Public Schools. Debbie is incorporating these little black boxes in a very unique way!
Book Trailers: Take one and ACTION!
Q: How are you using QR codes? A: At Holdingford Public Schools we are creating QR Codes that hold book trailers so students will be able to access additional information about a book using their iTouch or iPad. We are currently focusing on content appropriate for 5-6th graders. In the high school we are thinking about using QR codes to create short how-to videos for students using their Edline account or certain databases.
Q: What sparked the idea? A: I had been reading articles. I also heard about QR codes at a couple of conferences I had recently attended.
Q: Your goal was to… A: Get students excited about books (new and old titles) that they might not check out otherwise.
Q: What resources have you been using? A: For the trailers, we use Google search and YouTube in which the bulk of the trailers have been done by other students. The QR Codes themselves are generated using a free site made available by QR Stuff.
Q: Any challenges? A: Finding quality book trailers. A: The process from start to finish is more time consuming then we anticipated. A: Finding unique ways to display the QR Codes themselves. We are planning on placing them on the back of the books by the check-out bar code and designing a display for the wall that can be posted in the library.
Debbie’s question(s) for other CMLE Members? Submit your responses in the comment section below. Q: How have others incorporated QR codes in their libraries and/or teaching? Q: Are kids really using them?
**This update was written by Elaine Keefe, MLA/MEMO Library Legislative Lobbyist**
As of Tuesday, April 2nd the Legislature has seven weeks to conclude its work before the constitutional adjournment deadline of May 20.
Committee Deadlines: Last Friday was the second committee deadline. To meet that deadline, bills must have passed through policy committees and have been referred to either the floor or a finance committee in both the House and the Senate. Bills that have not met the deadline cannot proceed on their own, but they can still be amended onto other bills that are moving forward.
Budget: Last week House and Senate leaders released their respective budget targets for each area of the budget (E-12 education, higher education, health & human services, transportation, etc.). Over the next two weeks committees will be unveiling their omnibus finance bills, marking them up and passing them. The deadline for passing omnibus finance bills out of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee is Friday, April 19.
Legacy: The House Legacy Committee will release the Arts and Cultural Heritage article of its omnibus bill on Wednesday, April 3. We have strong support in the House and I expect libraries to do well in that bill. The Senate Legacy Subcommittee has not met yet (except for two joint hearings with the House on items unrelated to libraries) and no meetings have been announced. Mark Ranum and I have met with most of the members of the subcommittee and they have been supportive. However, we have not been able to meet with the chair, who has previously taken the position that libraries should apply to the State Arts Board for grants rather than receiving Legacy funding directly. We have submitted a proposal for funding to the Legacy subcommittee and I have met with the subcommittee staff twice. I’m told we will have an opportunity to make a presentation at some point, but no schedule has been mapped out. This is consistent with the pattern that has existed since the Legacy amendment was passed in 2008. The House comes out with its bill first, and the Senate takes a look at it and then puts together its own version.
Minitex/MnLINK: As reported previously, our bill to increase funding for Minitex and MnLINK was heard in the Senate Higher Education Policy and Budget Division on March 19 and it was well-received by the committee. We have a very supportive chair in Senator Terri Bonoff and her committee has a fairly generous budget target, so I am hopeful we will see an increase for Minitex and MnLINK in the Senate. The House is another matter. When Mark Ranum, Valerie Horton and I met with the House Higher Education chair, Rep. Gene Pelowski, he told us flat out that this was not the year when we could expect to see an increase, even though he agrees that Minitex and MnLINK are valuable programs. His goal for this year is structural reform of what he views as a bloated higher ed system. He said that we would have our chance in the next budget cycle two years from now. The House budget target for higher education is far lower than the Senate’s target ($150 million in new spending in the House vs. $263 million in the Senate). Our bill has not received a hearing and the omnibus bill is scheduled to be unveiled on Wednesday.
Homework Help: I am very disappointed to report that our bill will not receive a hearing in either body. There are several reasons for this, but I think the main one is that, like the Governor, legislators are focusing resources on the big pieces in the budget — the general ed formula, special education and early learning (all day kindergarten and preschool scholarships). The chair of the House Education Finance Committee, Rep. Paul Marquart, reacted quite negatively to the idea of Homework Help when we met with him. He said, “We are struggling to find the money to adequately fund the things we already have — we can’t fund anything new.” I had hoped that he would come around after budget targets were announced. The House education target is a healthy number — $550 million in new spending. I again asked for a hearing but was told no. Senators on the E-12 Education Budget Division, including the chair, were supportive of Homework Help in our meetings. However, the Senate’s budget target for education is quite skimpy when one takes into account that legislative leaders have dictated that the bulk of the target be spent on buying down education levies and fully funding all day kindergarten. The Senate will probably have to choose between increasing the general ed formula and special ed — they don’t have enough money to do both. In this scenario, Homework Help became a casualty.
Bonding: Although we have normally pursued funding for Library Accessibility and Improvement Grants in the second year of the biennium because that’s when the Legislature traditionally passes a major bonding bill, the House has been pushing hard for a significant bonding bill this year. At the urging of Rep. Alice Hausman, chair of the House Capital Investment Committee, we had a bill introduced to provide $3 million for Library Accessibility and Improvement Grants. The bill is HF 1501/ SF 1473. Rep. Mary Murphy and Senator Alice Johnson are our chief authors and we have a great bi-partisan group of co-authors. The Senate seems to be warming up to the idea of a larger than usual bonding bill in the first year of the biennium, so there may be an opportunity for us. Stay tuned.
Elaine Keefe Capitol Hill Associates
525 Park Street, Suite 310
St. Paul, MN 55103
office 651-293-0229
fax 651-293-1709
cell 612-590-1244 elaine@capitolhillassoc.com
As an organization CMLE has a unique voice! Comprised of more than 300 members, resonating over 12 counties, as individuals and as a unified collective our members benefit! As a catalyst for library personnel, CMLE strives to encourage career development opportunities that actively engage our members. A few months ago, CMLE launched a pilot program in which our member(s) could elect to spend a day “shadowing” another librarian/media specialist working in a different library type. The goal of the “Shadowing Program” is to provide a platform to support continued professional growth and build awareness. Through this program, we hope participants will uncover commonalities, discover potential differences, and observe plausible approaches to current issues.
Here is their story: School Librarian Walks Alongside Academic Librarian! Narrative by Maria Burnham, K-12 School Media Representative at Sauk Rapids-Rice High School shadowing Amy Springer Academic Librarian, College of St. Benedict’s/St. Johns University.
Snow and Insight
Stepping onto the campus of St. John’s University was like coming home for me. And on a beautiful snowy March day, the scenery couldn’t have been any more surreal. Big, fluffy white flakes clung to the boughs of the pine trees, students bundled up in hats and scarves made their way from class to class, and the towering abby’s bell greeted me with it’s familiar ringing-the day was postcard perfect.
As a St. Ben’s grad, I was excited to spend the afternoon on campus, stepping back into a setting where my days were full of reading, writing, analyzing and debating. Walking into the Alcuin library, I was unsure of what to expect from this shadowing experience I verbally agreed to with CMLE. All I knew was that Amy Springer from CSB/SJU was expecting me at noon and I carried with me a hundred questions in my mind (only about 10 of which were written down on paper).
It turns out that my experience with academic librarians in my lifetime has been pretty limited-a quick trip to the reference desk or a book checkout at the circulation desk is about all anything every amounted to in my time at St. Ben’s. Not to brag, but I guess I’ve always been a pretty library-savvy student, even in my college days when my research needs were more than a Google search away. So when preparing for my shadowing day, I wanted to learn more about the post-secondary world and whether or not I was sending my high school students fully prepared for college in the 11 years I’ve been a high school educator both in the classroom and in the library.
From the moment I stepped in to Amy’s office, it was clear that I was in good hands. Her office, although small and practically windowless, is welcoming and friendly thanks to the fun framed pictures of famous hanging around the room. With a warm smile and a handshake, Amy began to introduce me to her world.
Our first hour together was spent at the reference desk. Amy showed me the format and options that students have in communicating with librarians. Email or chat, CSB/SJU students have options in finding research answers without even physically setting foot in the library. These remote contact options got me thinking, “When my students are stuck in their research from home, what are their options in finding answers to their questions?” At CSB/SJU, students can also utilize the librarian who is sitting at the actual reference desk, but most students access library help electronically. I watched the process of Amy responding to a few emails, and as she finished answering the students, we spent time talking about the specialty areas of the librarians on campus and how they each log any reference questions they receive in order to track frequency and types of questions that are coming in from students. Overall, I found the reference routine to be efficient and thorough, and I love the idea of tracking student questions and library responses.
After our time at the reference desk, Amy treated me to lunch. Over lunch, along with two of Amy’s colleagues, we discussed eBooks and their place in libraries. Considering I have yet to dabble in the eBook world, I had many questions for this group as I see this part of the library world changing every day. From what I gathered from our discussions, the eBook world continues to evolve and there is no prescribed formula for eBook success. And maybe there never will be, but it sure makes for an interesting discussion considering the varying formats and quirks in working with the publishing world.
Back at the library after lunch, Amy gave me a tour of the library where I saw some of the unique parts of the facility. I also met many of the other librarian staff in the Alcuin library including the archivist and the interlibrary loan associate. It’s clear that departmentally the library staff work together along with their student workers to meet the needs of their patrons.
Perhaps one of my favorite parts of the day was talking about Facebook and Twitter. Amy is in charge of social media marketing for the college libraries we discussed the power of Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest. She uses Hoot Suite to manage her posts and to track the traffic of her clientele. Each day, she posts about a variety of topics including recent acquisitions of the collection.
At the end of my visit, I felt invigorated from the information I received and from the potential collaboration I see between high schools and post-secondary institutions. For example, St. Ben’s and St. John’s hosts a “Digital Commons” on their library site, a place where faculty and student writing and projects can be published for all to see. How powerful to be able to see the work of professors and students! As I’m talking to my senior high school students preparing to leave the cozy nest of high school this spring, I will be showing them the expectations and standards of projects at a post-secondary institution. Even Amy Springer is published in the Digital Commons with an article about using pop culture in research lessons to maintain student engagement. After all, who wouldn’t pay attention if the goal was to research the outlook of Snooki’s business dream?
At the end of my visit (which arrived in the blink of an eye, it seemed), Amy said that she learned just as much from me as I learned from her. That’s quite the compliment considering I walked away with my head spinning with information and ideas. Spending the day with another librarian-someone who understands the job, mainly its pitfalls and triumphs-was incredible. For a majority of the time, I spend my days and weeks as a department of one. But not on that snowy, March day. That day, I felt the power of collaboration.
This CMLE Update has been provided by Mark Ranum, MLA Legislative Chair
Alice Hausman, Chair of the Capital Investment Committee, asked last week about a library request for the bonding bill being proposed this year. We have submitted a request for $3M for the public library construction and accessibility grant program. It’s HF1501 http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/bills/billnum.asp?billnumber=hf1501
All library bills we are pursuing as a part of the library platform have now been introduced. The other bills are listed below.
2013 Library Legislative Platform Issues Status: Bills, Authors, and Committees
1. Fund Regional Public Library Basic System Support.
SF453 Wiger
HF630 Marquart
2. Fund Multicounty, Multitype Regional Library System Support.
SF453 Wiger
HF630 Marquart
3. Fund Telecommunications Equity Aid and Regional Library Telecommunications Aid.
SF453 Wiger
HF630 Marquart
4. Fund Minitex at $5,631,000 each year of the biennium.
SF995 Eken, Clausen
HF1150 Winkler, Nornes, Brynaert
5. Fund MnLINK at $400,000 each year of the biennium.
SF995 Eken, Clausen
HF1150 Winkler, Nornes, Brynaert
6. Fund Electronic Library for Minnesota (ELM) at current levels each year of the biennium
SF781 Hoffman, Johnson, Stumpf, Jensen, Nelson
HF1145 Brynaert, S. Erickson
7. Dedicate the entire proceeds of the Permanent School Fund for school technology and library media resources to support Common Core Standards and other initiatives.
No action. Lack of support from the Governor and House/Senate Leadership.
8. Appropriate $750,000 in the first year and $600,000 in the second year of the biennium to subscribe, implement, and promote free, online homework help for all MN students.
SF781 Hoffman, Johnson, Stumpf, Jensen, Nelson
HF1145 Brynaert, S. Erickson
9. Change the Regional Public Library Legacy funding formula by replacing the equalization factor in the formula with a “qualifying system entities” factor.
Elaine Keefe and Mark Ranum are working to include this in the appropriation language.
No specific lobbying effort is required at this time on this specific issue.
10. Fund Regional Public Library Legacy initiatives at $4,250,000 for each year of the biennium from the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund.
No bill number. The process to request funds does not require a bill.
We have testified in the House Legacy Committee on our request. The Senate Legacy Committee has not met to hear requests from the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund.
11. Fund the Minnesota Digital Library at $750,000 to expand into a statewide digital preservation initiative from the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund.
No bill number. The process to request funds does not require a bill.
12. Add data privacy protection for electronic materials and services to MS13.40.
SF745 Diedzic, Latz, Nelson
HF695 Simon
Mark Ranum, Director
Plum Creek Library System
Box 697
290 S. Lake Street
Worthington, MN 56187
507.376.5803 ext. 1 (office)
612.701.9989 (cell) mranum@plumcreeklibrary.net
There will also be a Senate companion to HF 1501. Sen. Alice Johnson has signed on as our chief author. I hope to get it introduced on Monday.
We are excited to report that some of your colleagues (librarians/media specialists) have indicated their interest in helping us produce our What’s Happening blog posts. We are simply delighted in this interest and encourage you to consider joining in too. We will of course give guest bloggers a non-judgmental copy edit, give them their own byline, and include the title of their completed post in our Thursday CMLE Weekly Review email message. We are giving guest bloggers freedom in choosing what to write about and encourage them to use the space to share exciting news about “What’s Happening” in their world or to communicate what’s keeping them up at night.
When you see these guest bloggers emerge, please be sure to comment on their posts and give them kudos for their bravery in joining us in the blogosphere!
Partnering with libraries for visioning, advocating, and educating